Articles Comments

Yeshua in Context >> Featured , Gematria , Literary Features >> Gematria in the New Testament?

Gematria in the New Testament?

Sometimes I can't resist skipping ahead in a book. Preparing for the "Eyewitnesses in the Gospels" seminar coming up June 5, 2011, here in Atlanta, I decided to start a second book by Richard Bauckham, The Testimony of the Beloved Disciple: Narrative, History, and Theology in the Gospel of John . When I saw the final chapter, "The 153 Fish and the Unity of the Fourth Gospel," I had to skip ahead. And here are some interesting facts that sound like a combination of the show Numb3rs and biblical scholarship . . .

Gematria is the rabbinic term for finding numerical patterns in the biblical text. It is not a term that was used in the time the New Testament was written. But numerical patterns are definitely part of the biblical style. Umberto Cassutos commentary on Genesis, for example, notes the extensive use of numerical patterns there. In many sections, words are used either seven times or in multiples of sevens, and numerous other patterns emerge for those who like to find them. It was in some biblical texts part of the literary art of writing.

Triangular numbers, which are relatively rare, are the sum of all the numbers in sequence that lead up to them. 28, for example, is a triangular number (1+2+3+4+5+6+7) and so on with 36, 45, 55, 66, 78, 91, 105, 120, 136, and 153.

What does this all have to do with the Gospel of John?

Well, the observation of Bauckham began with John 21:11, "So Simon Peter went aboard and hauled the net ashore, full of large fish, a hundred and fifty-three of them; and although there were so many, the net was not torn."

Yes, 153 is a triangular number. M.J.J. Mencken wrote a dissertation on it in 1985 ( Numerical Literary Techniques in John ). Bauckham lists three examples from Mencken's work:

(1) The Prologue of John (1:1-18) has 496 syllables, a triangular number (and also a "perfect" number, meaning it is equal to the sum of its divisors). And 496 is the numerical value (Greek letters, as well as Hebrew, have numerical values) of the important Johannine word monogenes (monogenes, only, as in John 1:14).

(2) The next section (1:9 - 2:11) has 1,550 syllables (triangular would be 1,540) which is the value of ho christos (o khristos, the Messiah or the Christ).

(3) Yeshua's prayer to the Father in 17:1b-26 has 486 (triangular would be 496) words which is the value of pater (pater, father).

Bauckham had another example suggested to him in a personal conversation with Asher Finkel: the longer form of Yeshua's name is Yehoshua, which in Hebrew has the same numerical value as "lamb of God" (SHh hAlhym). Hmm, John 1:29, 35-36).

So, what is up with 153, the triangular number found in John 21:11? It is the value of "sons of God" in Hebrew (bny hAlhym). Why not the Greek numerical equivalent (tekna theou)? That has a value of 860, which is not triangular and which would be too large a catch of fish to be believable.

Furthermore, Bauckham suggests that the author of John (the Beloved Disciple, a.k.a. the Elder John, not the son of Zebedee who was one of the twelve) may have known the gematria in Ezekiel 47 (the river of life passage). People there will fish from En-Gedi to En-Egla'im, which have the numerical values of 17 and 153 respectively (gdy, `glym), both triangular numbers. And the obvious comparison is the issue of fishing in the world to come in John 21 as well as Ezekiel 47.

How cool is all that?

Oh, and the most famous triangular number that also has bearing on the New Testament? Yep, 666.

Here is a list of triangular numbers for enthusiasts: 0, 1, 3, 6, 10, 15, 21, 28, 36, 45, 55, 66, 78, 91, 105, 120, 136, 153, 171, 190, 210, 231, 253, 276, 300, 325, 351, 378, 406, 435, 465, 496, 528, 561, 595, 630, 666, 703, 741, 780, 820, 861, 903, 946, 990, 1035, 1081, 1128, 1176, 1225, 1275, 1326, 1378, 1431...

Written by

Filed under: Featured , Gematria , Literary Features

8 Responses to "Gematria in the New Testament?"

  1. Thanks for this informative article. I'm going to list it as related reading for my article on Is Gematria Helpful in Decoding the Genesis King Lists?

    Triangular numbers, sets of three, and pyramids have very ancient symbolism. There was even a name for God associated with the number 3: Baal Shalisha.

  2. Wow ... this is very cool! And I am totally not surprised to learn this.

  3. Carl Kinbar says:

    I'm curious about how Menken deals with the numerous manuscript variants in the gospel of John, since the addition or subtraction of a single word or syllable undermines every calculation.

    1. yeshuain says:

      Absolutely. Bauckham discusses this and it is not an insuperable difficulty. Concerning the section in 20:31 - 21:25, Bauckham comments: "On the one hand there must be good text-criticual support for the readings selected, but, on the other hand, it is not improper, where the textual evidence is not decisively in favor of one reading, to allow considerations of numerical literary technique to play some part in tipping the balance."

      1. Carl Kinbar says:

        The root issue here is establishing the text of the original "autographs" without error. The very fact that new eclectic editions keep on appearing (the latest at SBL last year) indicates that there is no consensus on the precise text of the originals-the goal is to approach it as closely as possible.

        Yet, for the structural approach, close is not good enough-even if you are only off by one syllable or word, the text is not reliable for strict mathematical purposes. I respect Bauckham greatly, but he seems to be out on the fringe by suggesting that numerics should tip the balance in making text-critical decisions.

  4. yeshuain says:

    Carl, your point is a good one, of course. To be clear: the numerical features tend to come in sections so the margin of error in # of syllables is there, to be sure, but not as much so as if it involved the whole book or long sections.

  5. This is really cool. Do you mind if I post this on my website? Obviously, I will give you the credit for the information.

    Blessings in Yeshua

    1. yeshuain says:

      No problem, Brian.

Leave a Reply


You may use these HTML tags and attributes: